The Lawsuits Behind Bloom Action

Legal Action in Pursuit of Accountability

Bloom Action documents legal proceedings initiated by Gina Bloom as part of her constitutional right to seek judicial review and redress of grievances. These actions extend beyond a private dispute and raise broader questions about the administration of justice and the oversight of court appointed professionals in Washington State.

After years navigating family courts, law enforcement agencies, and other quasi judicial roles, Bloom filed civil actions addressing how certain institutions and officials exercise authority in matters involving families and children. This page provides access to public filings that examine issues of due process, municipal accountability, and the legal frameworks governing those entrusted with the welfare of families.

This archive includes lawsuits involving government entities, court appointed professionals, and other parties whose actions are a matter of public record. All documents presented here originate from formal court filings, sworn testimony, or official transcripts.

Public Transparency

Bloom Action publishes these materials to promote transparency and allow the public, policymakers, and legal professionals to review the judicial record independently. The filings contain allegations that remain subject to ongoing review and determination by the courts, and all defendants are presumed innocent unless and until a final judgment is reached. Sensitive personal identifiers have been redacted to protect the privacy and best interests of the minor children involved.

Public Filings: Public Records. Private Failures.

Bloom v. Parker et al (Guardian ad Litem)

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Bloom v. Snohomish County & Superior Court

This civil tort action seeks institutional accountability for alleged professional misconduct during Snohomish County family court proceedings . The complaint alleges a coordinated civil conspiracy between a court-appointed Guardian ad Litem (GAL) and opposing counsel to construct a false narrative regarding the Plaintiff’s mental health . This litigation highlights the systemic need for oversight of court-appointed actors who wield significant influence over the lives of families and children .

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Bloom v. Snohomish County & Superior Court

Bloom v. Snohomish County United States District Court for the Western District of Washington | Case No. 24-02155This federal civil rights action challenges the systemic policies, customs, and practices of Snohomish County’s Guardian ad Litem (GAL) program. The lawsuit alleges that the County’s "deliberate indifference" in training and overseeing court-appointed professionals resulted in the violation of the Plaintiff’s fundamental constitutional rights.

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

This civil action for damages and declaratory relief challenges the State of Washington and the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) for the systemic failure to regulate the Guardian ad Litem (GAL) program. The lawsuit alleges that the State’s refusal to implement mandatory oversight protocols created a vacuum of accountability, enabling court-appointed professionals to violate fundamental constitutional rights without state-level intervention or recourse.

Bloom v. City of Lake Stevens

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

This civil tort action involves claims of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, assault, battery, and false imprisonment. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages for injuries and trauma allegedly sustained during an extended pattern of domestic violence. By pursuing this matter in civil court, the Plaintiff asserts her right to judicial personal injury redress independent of previous family law proceedings.

Bloom v. City of Lake Stevens

This federal civil rights action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges a comprehensive pattern of constitutional violations by the City of Lake Stevens and its police department. The lawsuit asserts that municipal actors engaged in First Amendment retaliation, the selective enforcement of laws, and a systemic failure to protect a survivor of domestic violence and sexual assault. The complaint details a disturbing institutional culture where law enforcement allegedly transitioned from a protective entity to an adversarial participant in Bloom’s ongoing struggle for safety and custodial integrity.

The Lawsuits Behind Bloom Action

Legal Action in Pursuit of Accountability

Public Filings: Public Records. Private Failures.

Bloom v. Parker et al (Guardian ad Litem)

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Bloom v. Snohomish County & Superior Court

Bloom v. Snohomish County & Superior Court

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Bloom v. Snohomish County & Superior Court

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Yorks v. Yorks Civil Tort

Bloom v. City of Lake Stevens

Bloom v. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Bloom v. City of Lake Stevens

Bloom v. City of Lake Stevens

Bloom v. City of Lake Stevens

This website uses cookies.